Crisis-proof services: Why trade in services did not suffer during the 2008–2009 collapse

Journal of International Economics, 2016, vol. 98, issue C, 138-149

Abstract: During the 2008–2009 crisis, trade in goods fell by almost 30%. In contrast, trade in business, telecommunication and financial services continued growing at their pre-crisis rates and only services related to transport declined. Using trade data at the firm-product-destination level for Belgium, I show that during the crisis the elasticity of services exports with respect to GDP growth in destination countries was significantly different from that of goods exports. In particular, the negative income shock in partner countries affected exports of goods but not exports of services. This difference is economically sizable: if goods exports had had the same elasticity to GDP growth as services exports, their fall during the 2008–2009 collapse would have been only half what was observed.

Keywords: Trade collapse; Service resilience; Trade in services and goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (48)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615001415
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Crisis-proof services: Why trade in services did not suffer during the 2008-2009 collapse (2015)
Working Paper: Crisis-proof services: Why trade in services did not suffer during the 2008-2009 collapse (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:98:y:2016:i:c:p:138-149

DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.09.002

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().