Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies

Journal of Econometrics, 2011, vol. 160, issue 1, 246-256

Abstract: The use of a conditionally unbiased, but imperfect, volatility proxy can lead to undesirable outcomes in standard methods for comparing conditional variance forecasts. We motivate our study with analytical results on the distortions caused by some widely used loss functions, when used with standard volatility proxies such as squared returns, the intra-daily range or realised volatility. We then derive necessary and sufficient conditions on the functional form of the loss function for the ranking of competing volatility forecasts to be robust to the presence of noise in the volatility proxy, and derive some useful special cases of this class of "robust"Â loss functions. The methods are illustrated with an application to the volatility of returns on IBM over the period 1993 to 2003.

Keywords: Forecast; evaluation; Forecast; comparison; Loss; functions; Realised; variance; Range (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (671)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4076(10)00076-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Volatility Forecast Comparison using Imperfect Volatility Proxies (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:160:y:2011:i:1:p:246-256

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Econometrics is currently edited by T. Amemiya, A. R. Gallant, J. F. Geweke, C. Hsiao and P. M. Robinson

More articles in Journal of Econometrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().