[go: up one dir, main page]

  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Pros and Cons of Workplace Tournaments

Roman Sheremeta ()

Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute

Abstract: Tournaments are commonly used in the workplace to determine promotion, assign bonuses, and motivate personal development. Tournament-based contracts can be very effective in eliciting high effort, often outperforming other compensation contracts, but they can also have negative consequences for both managers and workers. The benefits and disadvantages of workplace tournaments have been identified in theoretical, empirical, and experimental research over the past several decades. Based on these findings, I provide suggestions and guidelines for when it might be beneficial to use tournaments in the workplace.

Keywords: tournaments; contests; competition; contracts; workplace (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C7 C8 C9 J4 J7 L1 L2 M1 M5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-hrm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chapman.edu/research-and-institutions/e ... s-pros-cons-2016.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: The Pros and Cons of Workplace Tournaments (2017) Downloads
Journal Article: The pros and cons of workplace tournaments (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: The Pros and Cons of Workplace Tournaments (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:16-27

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().

 
Page updated 2024-12-21
Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:16-27