How Costly is it to Ignore Breaks when Forecasting the Direction of a Time Series?

Allan Timmermann and Mohammad Pesaran

No 875, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: Empirical evidence suggests that many macroeconomic and financial time series are subject to occasional structural breaks. In this paper we present analytical results quantifying the effects of such breaks on the correlation between the forecast and the realization and on the ability to forecast the sign or direction of a time-series that is subject to breaks. Our results suggest that it can be very costly to ignore breaks. Forecasting approaches that condition on the most recent break are likely to perform better over unconditional approaches that use expanding or rolling estimation windows provided that the break is reasonably large.

Keywords: sign prediction; estimation window; structural breaks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ets and nep-fin
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo_wp875.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: How costly is it to ignore breaks when forecasting the direction of a time series? (2004)
Working Paper: How Costly is it to Ignore Breaks when Forecasting the Direction of a Time Series? (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_875

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().