SIGNAL EXTRACTION AND RATIONAL INATTENTION
Yulei Luo () and
Eric Young
Economic Inquiry, 2014, vol. 52, issue 2, 811-829
Abstract:
type="main" xml:lang="en">
In this paper we examine the implications of two theories of informational frictions, signal extraction (SE) and rational inattention (RI), for optimal decisions and economic dynamics within the linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) setting. We first show that if the variance of the noise and channel capacity (or marginal information cost) is fixed exogenously in the SE and RI problems, respectively, the two environments lead to different policy and equilibrium asset pricing implications. Second, we find that if the signal-to-noise ratio and capacity in the SE and RI problems are fixed, respectively, the two theories generate the same policy implications in the univariate case, but different policy implications in the multivariate case. We also show that our results do not depend on the presence of correlation between fundamental and noise shocks. We then discuss the applications to macroeconomic models of permanent income and price-setting. (JEL C61, D81, E21)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecin.12073 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:52:y:2014:i:2:p:811-829
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://ordering.onl ... s.aspx?ref=1465-7295
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Tim Salmon
More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().