Capital Controls: Myth and Reality - A Portfolio Balance Approach

Nicolas Magud, Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff

No 16805, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The literature on capital controls has (at least) four very serious apples-to-oranges problems: (i) There is no unified theoretical framework to analyze the macroeconomic consequences of controls; (ii) there is significant heterogeneity across countries and time in the control measures implemented; (iii) there are multiple definitions of what constitutes a "success" and (iv) the empirical studies lack a common methodology-furthermore these are significantly "overweighted" by a couple of country cases (Chile and Malaysia). In this paper, we attempt to address some of these shortcomings by: being very explicit about what measures are construed as capital controls. Also, given that success is measured so differently across studies, we sought to "standardize" the results of over 30 empirical studies we summarize in this paper. The standardization was done by constructing two indices of capital controls: Capital Controls Effectiveness Index (CCE Index), and Weighted Capital Control Effectiveness Index (WCCE Index). The difference between them lies in that the WCCE controls for the differentiated degree of methodological rigor applied to draw conclusions in each of the considered papers. Inasmuch as possible, we bring to bear the experiences of less well known episodes than those of Chile and Malaysia. Then, using a portfolio balance approach we model the effects of imposing capital controls on short-term flows. We find that there should exist country-specific characteristics for capital controls to be effective. From this simple perspective, this rationalizes why some capital controls were effective and some were not. We also show that the equivalence in effects of price- vs. quantity-capital control are conditional on the level of short-term capital flows.

JEL-codes: E44 E5 F3 F30 F32 F34 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ifn and nep-mac
Note: IFM ME
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (253)

Published as Nicolas E. Magud & Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2018. "Capital Controls: Myth and Reality--A Portfolio Balance Approach," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 19(1), pages 1-47, May.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w16805.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Capital Controls: Myth and Reality--A Portfolio Balance Approach (2018)
Working Paper: Capital Controls: Myth and Reality--A Portfolio Balance Approach (2011)
Working Paper: Capital Controls: Myth and Reality--A Portfolio Balance Approach (2011)
Working Paper: Capital Controls: A Meta-analysis Approach (2011)
Working Paper: Capital Controls: Myth and Reality A Portfolio Balance Approach to Capital Controls (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16805

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w16805

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().