[go: up one dir, main page]


Decentralization and Mechanism Design for Online Machine Scheduling

Authors Birgit Heydenreich, Rudolf Müller, Marc Uetz



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagSemProc.06461.7.pdf
  • Filesize: 127 kB
  • 4 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Birgit Heydenreich
Rudolf Müller
Marc Uetz

Cite As Get BibTex

Birgit Heydenreich, Rudolf Müller, and Marc Uetz. Decentralization and Mechanism Design for Online Machine Scheduling. In Negotiation and Market Engineering. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6461, pp. 1-4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.06461.7

Abstract

We study the online version of the classical parallel machine
scheduling problem to minimize the total weighted completion time
from a new perspective: We assume that the data of each job,
namely its release date $r_j$, its processing time $p_j$ and its
weight $w_j$ is only known to the job itself, but not to the
system. Furthermore, we assume a decentralized setting where jobs
choose the machine on which they want to be processed themselves.
We study this problem from the perspective of algorithmic
mechanism design. We introduce the concept of a myopic best
response equilibrium, a concept weaker than the dominant strategy
equilibrium, but appropriate for online problems. We present a
polynomial time, online scheduling mechanism that, assuming
rational behavior of jobs, results in an equilibrium schedule that
is 3.281-competitive. The mechanism deploys an online payment
scheme that induces rational jobs to truthfully report their
private data. We also show that the underlying local scheduling
policy cannot be extended to a mechanism where truthful reports
constitute a dominant strategy equilibrium.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Scheduling
  • mechanism design
  • online algorithms

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail